> You can take TWO screenshots, moments apart, open in GIMP, paste one over the other and choose any one of these laying modes:
You actually don't need any image editing skill. Here is a browser-only solution:
1. Take two screenshots.
2. Open these screenshots in two separate tabs on your browser.
3. Switch between tabs very, very quickly (use CTRL-Tab)
Source: tested on Firefox
sunrunner 39 minutes ago [-]
Neat idea.
A friend of mine made a similar animated GIF type captcha a few years ago but based on multiple scrolling horizontal bars that would each reveal their portion of the underlying image including letters, and made a (friendly) bet that it should be pretty hard to solve.
Grabbing the entire set of frames and greyscaling them, doing an average over all of them and then applying a few minor fixups like thresholding and contrast adjustment worked easily enough as the letters were reveleaed in more frames than not (I don't think that would affect the difficulty much though if it were any diffierent). After that the rest of the image was pretty amenable to character recognition.
amelius 26 minutes ago [-]
Yeah if this became popular, we'd have another Show HN for a tool that automated that.
LadyCailin 2 hours ago [-]
Or just copy the text from the url. Not very secure, really. :D
mike_hearn 2 hours ago [-]
Or just ... record a video of the screen.
Aeolun 13 minutes ago [-]
This should have an epilepsy warning. Or something of that kind. It certainly made me feel sick.
dorianmonnier 9 minutes ago [-]
Oh yes please add a warning. My brain is burning right now!
It's a nice effect, but I don't think it's usable in practice, because it's not accessible for visually impaired users: not enough contrast between foreground text and background
kemayo 6 hours ago [-]
This makes me feel motion-sick, which is kind of impressive because I'm normally not easily susceptible to that.
dylan604 6 hours ago [-]
My eyes went straight into seeing 3D image mode. It's the easiest one I've seen yet! /s
RedShift1 4 hours ago [-]
Heh my eyes felt like they started bleeding
quietfox 2 hours ago [-]
"The text disappears..."
And my eyesight with it
amelius 22 minutes ago [-]
Yeah but the randomness may produce all kinds of NSFW stuff ...
Doesn't even show anything on LibreWolf, probably disabled WebGL as usual. I thought it was a nice error screen, but apparently it was intended, just without the text :P
creatonez 26 minutes ago [-]
Seems to work if you disable canvas fingerprinting protection.
buibuibui 35 minutes ago [-]
This could be used for Captcha systems. Would current bots be able to decipher these?
dylan604 6 hours ago [-]
Has anyone tried a long exposure to see if the motion smears into something discernible? Obviously harder to expose a bright screen without some ND since the shutter speed is the phone's main exposure control
Perhaps this technique could be defeated by scrolling the background in the opposite direction as the text
lodovic 4 hours ago [-]
If you zoom out to 25 % the text is clearly visible and screenshottable.
EvgeniyZh 2 hours ago [-]
Probably the lower frequencies of noise are not matched? Not sure if the frequencies of the order of movement frequency can actually be matched
dasil003 4 hours ago [-]
How do you take a “long exposure” screenshot? Isn’t every screenshot a perfect digital copy of a single frame or a full on video?
dylan604 4 hours ago [-]
Clearly, I meant using a camera, and I'm guessing you knew that too
dice 4 hours ago [-]
Not the parent but that was not at all clear to me. I immediately thought of taking multiple successive instantaneous screenshots and then stacking them. I'm not sure I would have thought of using a camera within a few minutes to an hour, it's not a tool I would ever reach for normally.
catlifeonmars 3 hours ago [-]
I just did this with 50% transparency. It works
viccis 3 hours ago [-]
Also not the parent but how the hell did you not understand what "long exposure" means ffs
rkomorn 3 hours ago [-]
Because the context is about screenshots and context matters
"ffs".
vivegi 4 hours ago [-]
Cool. I used the Windows snipping tool and just screen-recorded it.
QuiCasseRien 2 hours ago [-]
Even is some have found a workaround, this is a cool feature
zikero 5 hours ago [-]
Another idea I had with this concept is to make an LLM-proof captcha. Maybe humans can detect the characters in the 'motion' itself, which could be unique to us?
- The captcha would be generated like this on a headless browser, and recorded as a video, which is then served to the user.
- We can make the background also move in random directions, to prevent just detecting which pixels are changing and drawing an outline.
- I tried also having the text itself move (bounce like the DVD logo). Somehow makes it even more readable.
I definitely know nothing about how LLMs interpret video, or optics, so please let me know if this is dumb.
5 hours ago [-]
squigz 5 hours ago [-]
As if captchas aren't painful enough for visually impaired users...
Firefox on Android seems to just be a static image, I can't see any text.
creatonez 27 minutes ago [-]
Probably the result of canvas fingerprinting protection configured in your `about:config`? With a default profile it seems to work fine on Firefox for Android.
stevage 5 hours ago [-]
Wfm
dgan 3 hours ago [-]
What i am supposed to see here? Its just static noisy background
j1436go 2 hours ago [-]
Had the same in LibreWolf under Manjaro Linux. Worked in Chrome.
giveita 3 hours ago [-]
Animation, but only inside a border that is the letters of Hello.
magios 59 minutes ago [-]
firefox on linux with a bunch of css stuff set to defaults or none !important shows a static image
elAhmo 2 hours ago [-]
If you blink really fast, the text almost disappears.
The only way to see the text is in the movement. The pattern across any single frame is entirely random noise.
thaumasiotes 3 hours ago [-]
> The pattern across any single frame is entirely random noise.
This is untrue in at least one sense. The patterning within the animated letters cycles. It is generated either by evaluating a periodic function or by reading from a file using a periodic offset.
giveita 2 hours ago [-]
Can't it be continuous random noise added at the top and then moved down each frame.
Roughly you create another full size rect. On each frame add a random pixel on row 1 and shift everything down.
Make that rest a layer below the top one which has Hello cut out as transparent.
In any single frame the result is random noise.
thaumasiotes 2 hours ago [-]
You could do that, but that's not what the page is doing.
You don't even need to maintain the approach of having the pattern within the text move downwards over time. You could redraw it every frame with random data, as if it was television static. It would still be easy to read, as long as the background stayed fixed.
viccis 3 hours ago [-]
For what it's worth, there are some websites that embed some crazy shit when you screenshot. On reddit, r/CenturyClub will fill your background with a slightly off-white version of your username so that they can identify leakers, and I'm not certain how exactly they do it.
You can also break it by recording the screen, of course.
3 hours ago [-]
altcognito 6 hours ago [-]
Fun side effect: staring at the letters for a bit makes the rest of the image move.
cryptoz 6 hours ago [-]
Had a lot of fun trying to break this. Turns out you can screenshot real easily by zooming out. Maybe there are other ways but I stopped trying :)
vunderba 5 hours ago [-]
yeah - I actually was initially confused since I wasn't having any issues screenshotting it but had forgotten that I have the default site zoom set to ~65%.
sans_souse 6 hours ago [-]
Not sure what you mean - I can screenshot it freely that's not the point the point is if you look then at the screenshot you cant discern the text because its a single frame now
This is on MacOS 15.6, Chromium (BrowserOS), captured with the OS' native screenshot utility. Since I was asked about the zoom factor, I now tried simply capturing it at 100% and it was still perfectly readable...
I guess the trick doesn't work on this browser.
chii 3 hours ago [-]
This is really interesting - because it means the "randomness" is different between the text and the background, and when you zoom out enough, the eye can distinguish it?
vunderba 2 hours ago [-]
hmmm I think it's probably just an aliasing / canvas drawing issue. When I bring a screenshot in heavily zoomed out 33% - the pixels comprising the "HELLO" shape have a significantly higher luminance than the rest of the background.
dylan604 6 hours ago [-]
I zoomed out to 90% and could make out something was there but wasn't easy to read. Zooming out further went back to just being noise. I also tried zooming in but with no success. What zoom level did you use and I guess we have to ask the standard what browser/version/OS/etc?? My FFv142 on macOS never took a screen grab like you did
dwg 6 hours ago [-]
Zooming out before taking screenshot and the text is no longer obfuscated. I tried and confirmed it works. In fact, the text is perhaps even more readable than the original.
anigbrowl 6 hours ago [-]
It depends how fast or slow your GPU is. I tried it and saw the effect you described, but within a second or two it started moving and was obscured again. Obviously you could automate the problem away.
dylan604 6 hours ago [-]
Mine freezes the animation on zoom change. Not sure you could automate against that
anigbrowl 3 hours ago [-]
What I meant was that even if it only freezes for a second, you could automate the screenshots to be captured during that time instead of trying to beat the clock manually
kps 5 hours ago [-]
The text reappears when I screenshot it twice.
UltraSane 5 hours ago [-]
Seems trivial to diff multiple screenshots to identify what parts move. Or just use a compression algorithm to do the same.
dazzlevolta 3 hours ago [-]
Would 2 screenshots be enough, I wonder?
boothby 3 hours ago [-]
Yeah, the letters are big enough, an xor shows the text quite clearly.
davidgerard 3 hours ago [-]
Screnshotted fine in Xfce.
hbbio 3 hours ago [-]
Coinbase was hacked for $400M when literally someone from outsourced support services was taking screenshots on their phone!
The culprit had more than 10k photos of all security details for thousands of wealthy customers.
gloosx 2 hours ago [-]
If it's even true someone from outsourced support has access to some sensitive security details then using this dumpster is almost like throwing your money out of the window.
Lighten, Screen, Addition, Darken, Multiply, Linear burn, Hard Mix, Difference, Exclusion, Subtract, Grain Extract, Grain Merge, or Luminance.
https://ibb.co/DDQBJDKR
You actually don't need any image editing skill. Here is a browser-only solution:
1. Take two screenshots.
2. Open these screenshots in two separate tabs on your browser.
3. Switch between tabs very, very quickly (use CTRL-Tab)
Source: tested on Firefox
A friend of mine made a similar animated GIF type captcha a few years ago but based on multiple scrolling horizontal bars that would each reveal their portion of the underlying image including letters, and made a (friendly) bet that it should be pretty hard to solve.
Grabbing the entire set of frames and greyscaling them, doing an average over all of them and then applying a few minor fixups like thresholding and contrast adjustment worked easily enough as the letters were reveleaed in more frames than not (I don't think that would affect the difficulty much though if it were any diffierent). After that the rest of the image was pretty amenable to character recognition.
They even provide the source code for the effect:
https://github.com/brantagames/noise-shader
On iPhone: screenrecord. Take screenshots every couple seconds. Overlay images with 50% transparency (I use Procreate Pocket for this part)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bg3RAI8uyVw
The effect is disrupted by introducing rendering artifacts, by watching the video in 144p or in this case by zooming out.
I'd love to know the name of this effect, so I can read more about the fMRI studies that make use of it.
What I've found so far:
Random Dot Kinematogram
Perceptual Organization from Motion (video of Flounder camouflage)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2VO10eDIyiE
"ffs".
- The captcha would be generated like this on a headless browser, and recorded as a video, which is then served to the user.
- We can make the background also move in random directions, to prevent just detecting which pixels are changing and drawing an outline.
- I tried also having the text itself move (bounce like the DVD logo). Somehow makes it even more readable.
I definitely know nothing about how LLMs interpret video, or optics, so please let me know if this is dumb.
This is untrue in at least one sense. The patterning within the animated letters cycles. It is generated either by evaluating a periodic function or by reading from a file using a periodic offset.
Roughly you create another full size rect. On each frame add a random pixel on row 1 and shift everything down.
Make that rest a layer below the top one which has Hello cut out as transparent.
In any single frame the result is random noise.
You don't even need to maintain the approach of having the pattern within the text move downwards over time. You could redraw it every frame with random data, as if it was television static. It would still be easy to read, as long as the background stayed fixed.
This is on MacOS 15.6, Chromium (BrowserOS), captured with the OS' native screenshot utility. Since I was asked about the zoom factor, I now tried simply capturing it at 100% and it was still perfectly readable...
I guess the trick doesn't work on this browser.
The culprit had more than 10k photos of all security details for thousands of wealthy customers.